How To Choose The Right Narrow-Linewidth Laser?

“Faced with numerous indicators such as laser linewidth, output power, and relative intensity noise (RIN), which one is truly the key?” “

When the budget is limited, how can the best balance be found between performance and cost?

The laser that operates stably in the laboratory frequently malfunctions in the industrial field. Where exactly is the problem?

If you have encountered similar troubles when choosing a narrow-linewidth laser, it is necessary to be clear that selecting the right laser is by no means a task that can be accomplished simply by comparing parameters. This requires you to have a deep understanding of the application requirements, analyze the hidden conditions behind the indicators, and even predict the possible challenges that may arise in actual use. Incorrect selection will not only lead to delays in the project schedule, but also may cause cost overruns. This article will sort out a set of practical decision-making logic for you to help you avoid common traps in the selection process.

Part One: Determine Where The Laser Line Width Will Play a Role

Many people directly ask when selecting a model, “How narrow should the laser line width be to be considered good?” However, the correct approach should be: the application scenario determines the specific requirements for the laser line width. The sensitivity of different usage scenarios to laser linewidth varies significantly. Blindly pursuing ultra-narrow linewidth may lead to a substantial increase in costs but fail to bring about actual benefits.

• Optical fiber communication field (such as 5G coherent transmission) :

The linewidth of the laser will directly affect the coherence and transmission distance of the signal. For instance, in coherent communication systems with a line width of over 100Gbps, it is typically required that the laser line width be less than 500kHz; otherwise, the signal is prone to crosstalk, leading to a decline in transmission quality.

• FMCW Lidar (for autonomous driving scenarios) :

The laser line width is closely related to the ranging accuracy – the narrower the line width, the farther the measurement distance and the higher the accuracy. If it is necessary to measure a target 1 kilometer away, the line width may need to be controlled below 100 KHZ, and the requirements for phase noise are also extremely strict; otherwise, the measurement results will show obvious fluctuations.

• Optical fiber sensing field (such as pipeline leakage monitoring) :

The requirements for laser line width vary among different sensing technologies. Take BOTDA distributed sensing as an example. Usually, the line width needs to be less than 1kHz, because the coherence length (approximately equal to the ratio of the speed of light to the line width) must be long enough to cover a sensing distance of tens of kilometers.

• Precision measurement field (such as gravitational wave detection) :

This type of scenario has extremely strict requirements for the laser line width. Usually, the line width needs to be less than 100Hz, or even reach the Hz level; otherwise, the measurement signal will be submerged by noise and accurate results cannot be obtained.

In addition to the laser line width, these indicators should not be ignored either:

1. Output power: It’s not the case that the higher the power, the better. However, insufficient power can lead to weak signal strength. For example, lidar requires higher power to detect long-distance targets, while spectroscopic measurements pay more attention to the stability of power.
2. Wavelength stability: In atomic physics experiments, the wavelength of the laser must precisely match the atomic transition frequency. Even the slightest deviation can lead to the failure of the experiment.
3. Environmental adaptability: Lasers used in industrial sites need to have a wide temperature operating range (such as -40 ℃ to 85℃), while laboratory equipment has relatively lenient requirements for temperature.
4. Volume and power consumption: Vehicle-mounted lidars typically require small and low-power lasers, while devices fixed in laboratories have lower requirements for volume.

Part Two: Analyzing The Hidden Conditions Behind The Laser Line Width Parameter

When you see that the lasers of two manufacturers are both marked with “laser line width 1kHz”, do not assume that their performance is the same. In fact, the values in the parameter table are merely surface information. The test conditions and methods are the key factors determining the actual performance.

1. Definition differences: Line width may be expressed as “Lorentz line width” or “Gaussian line width”, with different calculation methods; The common values of “FWHM (Half height Full Width)” and “integral line width” may also differ. It is necessary to pay attention to the specific definitions marked by the manufacturer.
2. The impact of test time: This is the most easily overlooked key point! If the manufacturer marks “laser linewidth 1kHz (integration time 1ms)”, and your application requires a stable signal for 10 seconds continuously, the long-duration linewidth may reach 10 KHZ at this time. This is just like when taking photos, a short shutter time can freeze moving objects, while a long exposure will cause the picture to be blurry.

Be sure to confirm with the manufacturer: “At what integration time was this line width data measured?” Are there any long-term stability test data?

3. The key roles of phase noise and Relative Intensity noise (RIN)

• Phase noise: It reflects the degree of “jitter” of the laser frequency. In scenarios such as FMCW lidar, even if the laser linewidth is relatively narrow, if the phase noise is too high, it will still cause significant fluctuations in the distance measurement values. It is recommended to request the manufacturer to provide noise spectrum data (such as the dBc/Hz value at a 10Hz offset, the lower the better).
• Relative Intensity noise (RIN) : Characterizes the fluctuation amplitude of laser power. In applications sensitive to signal-to-noise ratio such as optical fiber sensing, excessively high RIN can cause the signal to be submerged by noise, similar to the severe current interference during a telephone call.

4. Other performance indicators that need attention

• Power stability: If the nominal power of the laser is 100mW, but the power fluctuates to 80mW during actual operation, it may lead to inaccurate precision measurement results.
• Wavelength drift: It is necessary to understand the amount of wavelength drift when the temperature changes by 1℃. In the field of communication, wavelength drift may lead to channel mismatch and affect the transmission quality.

Part Three: Selection of Laser Line Width Suppliers

The technical route of narrow-linewidth lasers is like different means of transportation; there is no absolute superiority or inferiority. The key lies in whether it suits your “travel needs”.

Semiconductor lasers (DFB, DBR, external cavity ECL) :

• Advantages: Compact size (similar to the size of a mobile phone), relatively low cost (several thousand to tens of thousands of yuan), low power consumption, and easy to integrate into small devices (such as in-vehicle lidar).
• Limitations: Generally, the laser linewidth is at the kHz to MHz level (ECL can achieve a lower linewidth, but the structure is more complex), and the output power is mostly tens of mW, making it relatively sensitive to environmental vibrations.

Fiber laser

• Advantages: It can achieve an extremely narrow laser linewidth (<1kHz or even Hz level), with output power reaching the watt level. It has excellent stability and is suitable for high-precision scenarios (such as gravitational wave detection and high-end lidar).
• Limitations: Relatively large in size (usually shoebox or larger), high in cost (tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of yuan), and sensitive to bending and vibration (high-quality packaging is required).

Supplier selection

• Technical accumulation: Give priority to manufacturers that have been deeply involved in specific technical routes for many years, such as those specializing in fiber lasers, which may have more extensive experience in the ultra-narrow linewidth field.
• After-sales support: Confirm whether the manufacturer provides technical debugging services, the duration of the warranty period and the extended warranty policy. The response speed when encountering problems is of vital importance.
• Supply chain stability: Against the backdrop of global supply chain fluctuations, it is necessary to understand the production capacity and inventory situation of manufacturers in advance to avoid delivery delays.

Part Four: Six Common Selection Traps and Avoidance Strategies

Trap 1: Blindly trust the parameter table and ignore the test conditions

Response strategy: When obtaining the laser line width data, it is essential to confirm the “integration time, test temperature and other conditions”. Manufacturers without detailed data can be directly excluded.

Trap 2: Ignoring the influence of phase noise

Response strategy: In scenarios such as lidar and coherent communication, it is essential to require the manufacturer to provide the phase noise spectrum. Products without relevant data must not be purchased.

Trap 3: The challenge of underestimating environmental factors

Response strategy: For industrial scenarios, laser models with wide temperature range (such as -40 ℃ to 85℃) and vibration resistance should be selected to avoid direct use of laboratory equipment on site.

Trap 4: The interface does not match the control function

Response strategy: Confirm in advance whether the laser supports the required modulation method (such as TTL modulation) and equip it with compatible control software.

Trap 5: Neglecting equipment lifespan and warranty services

Response strategy: Inquire with the manufacturer about the “Mean Time between Failures (MTBF)” and the warranty period, and give priority to choosing suppliers that offer extended warranty services.

Trap 6: Skipping the sample testing stage

Coping strategy: Even if the budget is limited, it is necessary to insist on sample testing. There was once an engineer who purchased 10 lasers without testing them. Eventually, half of them could not be used on site, resulting in losses of hundreds of thousands of yuan.

Final Thoughts

The laser that meets the requirements is the best choice. Choosing a narrow-linewidth laser is like picking shoes: what others consider a “perfect model” may not fit your “foot shape”. The key lies in:

1. First, clarify the application scenarios
2. Examine the test conditions and noise characteristics behind the parameters again
3. Finally, the adaptability is verified through sample testing.

Please remember: There is no “absolutely best” narrow-linewidth laser; there is only the choice that is “most suitable” for your application requirements. Through systematic requirement analysis, parameter interpretation and test verification, you will effectively avoid selection risks, ensure that the system operates based on a stable and reliable light source, and ultimately achieve the design goals.

Related Products